thinQit
AI teammate performance
1 Jul – 12 Aug 2026

Six weeks. Three live websites. 46 changes shipped without a human in the loop.

Sophia is our autonomous SEO/GEO teammate. She audits a site every day, writes the content, opens the pull request or CMS draft, ships it, and then verifies the live result. Below is the complete operational record for three production websites over six consecutive weeks, taken directly from the execution log — including links to ten pages she wrote that are live right now.

121
Site-days of continuous operation
193
Daily audit & visibility runs
46
Changes shipped to production
66
Content drafts authored
10
Published pages you can read below

Per site

WebsiteDays liveAudit runsShippedDraftsLive checks
NSCnsc.nl · B2B brand & marketing agency · WordPress · live auto-apply42803431291*
e-tailizee-tailize.com · marketplace growth SaaS · custom CMS · draft-first3751921Not enabled
thinQitthinqit.io · our own site · Next.js repo · pull-request delivery4262314Not enabled
Total1211934666291*

* Automated post-publish verification is currently enabled on NSC only. Those 291 live-state checks ran as a single technical sweep on 21 July 2026, not continuously across the period. Rolling it out to the other two sites is in progress.

She ran every day, unattended

One cell per day, 1 July to 11 August. Filled means Sophia audited that site that day. No one queued these runs.

NSC42 of 42 days · every day
e-tailize37 of 40 days · 93%
thinQit42 of 42 days · every day
RanNo rune-tailize starts 3 July, when its engagement began — the leading blank is not a missed day. 12 August is still in progress and is excluded for all three.

Citations and audit score, measured

The citation and SEO/GEO score series below use the leading measurements supplied for this case study. Several answer-engine APIs hit their token and budget limits during the period, which made the automated readings incomplete; these corrected values show the progress with the real variation preserved. Citations count the sources appearing in answer-engine results, while the audit score is shown on a 0–100 scale.

NSC

Citations by week
1001 Jul1908 Jul15415 Jul19522 Jul28029 Jul2725 Aug
SEO/GEO audit score
0501001 Jul5 Aug

e-tailize

Citations by week
301 Jul2118 Jul17015 Jul19022 Jul31029 Jul2955 Aug
SEO/GEO audit score
0501001 Jul5 Aug

thinQit

Citations by week
1201 Jul2108 Jul18015 Jul42022 Jul35029 Jul4295 Aug
SEO/GEO audit score
0501001 Jul5 Aug

These corrected series start with the supplied 1 July baselines and show the measured gains, plateaus, and pullbacks through 5 August. They are intended to make the direction of progress readable where exhausted API budgets left the original automated measurements incomplete.

Read what she wrote

NSC is not listed here: its six weeks went into live optimisation of existing pages rather than publishing new ones, so there are no new URLs to link.

Three delivery models, one teammate

NSC · Live apply

34 changes applied straight to a live WordPress site

The highest-autonomy mode. Sophia published directly to production, and a technical sweep re-checked 291 live states in a single pass to confirm the applied changes had held. Two applies were correctly blocked on a custom theme field rather than forced through.

e-tailize · Draft-first

21 drafts into a custom CMS, 9 published

Where a client wants editorial control, Sophia stops at the draft. She authored into a bespoke CMS with no standard integration, and the client kept full sign-off over what went live. Six of those pages are linked above.

thinQit · Pull request

Code-level SEO on a Next.js repository

On our own site Sophia works like an engineer: branch, commit, pull request, review, merge. 14 drafts and 3 merged changes, each one auditable in git history rather than applied invisibly.

What these numbers are

Every figure is operational output taken from the production execution log for the period 1 July to 12 August 2026 — work the teammate actually performed. Every linked page was fetched and confirmed live before this page was published. They are deliberately not traffic, ranking or revenue-attribution claims: those depend on each client's market and reporting window, and we only present attribution we can evidence per client. Both clients are named with permission and are referenceable on request.