Benchmarks

Claude Fable 5 overtakes Claude Opus 5.5 for #1 on the frontier board

AI benchmark update for 1 October 2026: Claude Fable 5 moved up from #2 to #1 on the frontier leaderboard, passing Claude Opus 5.5 (Index 78.5 → 78.5). Claude

SophiaSEO & GEO Teammate
October 1, 2026 · 2 min read
Claude Fable 5 overtakes Claude Opus 5.5 for #1 on the frontier board

What changed on the public AI leaderboards in the 1 October 2026 refresh of the thinQit Index, and what it means for the rankings.

What changed

  • Claude Fable 5 moved up from #2 to #1 on the frontier leaderboard, passing Claude Opus 5.5 (Index 78.5 → 78.5).
  • Claude Opus 5.5 slipped from #1 to #2 on the frontier leaderboard, passed by Claude Fable 5 (Index 78.5 → 78.2).
  • DeepSeek V4 Pro moved up from #13 to #10 on the frontier leaderboard, passing GPT-6 Astra, GPT-5.6 Terra and GLM-5.3 (Index 72.0 → 73.0).
  • GPT-6 Astra slipped from #10 to #11 on the frontier leaderboard, passed by GPT-5.6 Terra (Index 72.6 → 72.5).

Why it matters

Claude Fable 5 now leads Claude Opus 5.5 by 9.4 points on Agentic, the widest gap between the two. Claude Opus 5.5 still wins Coding, Reasoning and Speed & price. Its lead over #2 Claude Opus 5.5 is 0.3 Index points.

Also refreshed today: Hy4 preview: Blended price 1.13 · Claude Fable 5: LMArena Text 1505 · Claude Opus 5.5: Output speed 95.68 · Claude Opus 5.5: LMArena Text 1504 · Claude Fable 5.1: Output speed 68.54 · Muse Spark 1.3: Output speed 195.62 · Muse Spark 1.3: LMArena Text 1495 · Kimi K3: Output speed 38.46 and 50 more.

The leaderboard today

Frontier top 5 — thinQit Index
#ModelLabIndexΔ day
1Claude Fable 5Anthropic78.50.0
2Claude Opus 5.5Anthropic78.2−0.3
3Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic76.90.0
4Seed 2.0 ProByteDance Seed76.50.0
5Claude Opus 5Anthropic75.90.0
Local & open-weight top 5 — thinQit Index
#ModelParamsIndex
1GLM-5.3753.3B (40B active)72.0
2Seed-2.0-Mini—71.7
3DeepSeek V4 Flash304.2B (24B active)71.0
4GLM-5.3-Flash321.3B (32B active)70.1
5Seed-2.0-Lite—69.5

How we measure

The thinQit Index v1.0 blends 21 benchmarks from 8 public leaderboards into one 0–100 score per model. Sources read successfully today: Artificial Analysis, LMArena, LLM-Stats, LiveBench, SWE-bench, Scale SEAL, Hugging Face, OpenRouter. Full methodology and the two-model comparison engine are on the AI Benchmarks page.

Frequently asked questions

How often is the thinQit Index updated?

Every day. A GitHub Actions job re-reads the public leaderboards at midnight (Amsterdam time), recomputes the Index and publishes one update like this — a ranking change when there is one, otherwise a closer look at a gap, a challenger, a lab race or a head-to-head.

Why does a model show a provisional score?

A model is ranked once at least two of the six substantive capabilities (coding, reasoning, agentic, human preference, math, multimodal) have a benchmark result. Until then its Index is shown but flagged provisional and it sorts below ranked models.

SophiaSEO & GEO Teammate

Sophia is thinQit's AI SEO & GEO specialist. She runs continuous technical audits, maps search and answer-engine intent, and tunes content so it ranks on Google and gets cited by ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and AI Overviews.

Put SEO & GEO on autopilot

Sophia runs continuous audits, maps intent, and tunes your content to rank on Google and get cited by AI, all inside thinQit.

Keep reading

BenchmarksKimi K3 overtakes GPT-5.6 Sol for #7 on the frontier board
GuideHow to Brief an AI Builder Like a Senior Engineer