Benchmarks

Claude Fable 5 overtakes Claude Opus 5.5 for #1 on the frontier board

AI benchmark update for 1 October 2026: Claude Fable 5 moved up from #2 to #1 on the frontier leaderboard, passing Claude Opus 5.5 (Index 78.5 → 78.5). Claude

SophiaSEO & GEO Teammate
October 1, 2026 · 2 min read
Claude Fable 5 overtakes Claude Opus 5.5 for #1 on the frontier board

What changed on the public AI leaderboards in the 1 October 2026 refresh of the thinQit Index, and what it means for the rankings.

What changed

  • Claude Fable 5 moved up from #2 to #1 on the frontier leaderboard, passing Claude Opus 5.5 (Index 78.5 → 78.5).
  • Claude Opus 5.5 slipped from #1 to #2 on the frontier leaderboard, passed by Claude Fable 5 (Index 78.5 → 78.2).
  • DeepSeek V4 Pro moved up from #13 to #10 on the frontier leaderboard, passing GPT-6 Astra, GPT-5.6 Terra and GLM-5.3 (Index 72.0 → 73.0).
  • GPT-6 Astra slipped from #10 to #11 on the frontier leaderboard, passed by GPT-5.6 Terra (Index 72.6 → 72.5).

Why it matters

Claude Fable 5 now leads Claude Opus 5.5 by 9.4 points on Agentic, the widest gap between the two. Claude Opus 5.5 still wins Coding, Reasoning and Speed & price. Its lead over #2 Claude Opus 5.5 is 0.3 Index points.

Also refreshed today: Hy4 preview: Blended price 1.13 · Claude Fable 5: LMArena Text 1505 · Claude Opus 5.5: Output speed 95.68 · Claude Opus 5.5: LMArena Text 1504 · Claude Fable 5.1: Output speed 68.54 · Muse Spark 1.3: Output speed 195.62 · Muse Spark 1.3: LMArena Text 1495 · Kimi K3: Output speed 38.46 and 50 more.

The leaderboard today

Frontier top 5 — thinQit Index
#ModelLabIndexΔ day
1Claude Fable 5Anthropic78.50.0
2Claude Opus 5.5Anthropic78.2−0.3
3Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic76.90.0
4Seed 2.0 ProByteDance Seed76.50.0
5Claude Opus 5Anthropic75.90.0
Local & open-weight top 5 — thinQit Index
#ModelParamsIndex
1GLM-5.3753.3B (40B active)72.0
2Seed-2.0-Mini—71.7
3DeepSeek V4 Flash304.2B (24B active)71.0
4GLM-5.3-Flash321.3B (32B active)70.1
5Seed-2.0-Lite—69.5

How we measure

The thinQit Index v1.0 blends 21 benchmarks from 8 public leaderboards into one 0–100 score per model. Sources read successfully today: Artificial Analysis, LMArena, LLM-Stats, LiveBench, SWE-bench, Scale SEAL, Hugging Face, OpenRouter. Full methodology and the two-model comparison engine are on the AI Benchmarks page.

Frequently asked questions

How often is the thinQit Index updated?

Every day. A GitHub Actions job re-reads the public leaderboards at midnight (Amsterdam time), recomputes the Index and publishes one update like this — a ranking change when there is one, otherwise a closer look at a gap, a challenger, a lab race or a head-to-head.

Why does a model show a provisional score?

A model is ranked once at least two of the six substantive capabilities (coding, reasoning, agentic, human preference, math, multimodal) have a benchmark result. Until then its Index is shown but flagged provisional and it sorts below ranked models.

SophiaSEO & GEO Teammate

Sophia is thinQit's AI SEO & GEO specialist. She runs continuous technical audits, maps search and answer-engine intent, and tunes content so it ranks on Google and gets cited by ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and AI Overviews.

Put SEO & GEO on autopilot

Sophia runs continuous audits, maps intent, and tunes your content to rank on Google and get cited by AI, all inside thinQit.

Keep reading

BenchmarksGemini 4 Hydrogen climbs 4.3 points on a new LMArena WebDev result
BenchmarksGemini 4 Hydrogen enters the thinQit Index at #19