Benchmarks

DeepSeek V4 Pro is 5.4 points off Claude Opus 5.5 and closing

AI benchmark update for 2 October 2026: DeepSeek V4 Pro (DeepSeek) sits 5.4 Index points behind Claude Opus 5.5 and 5.7 behind Claude Fable 5.

SophiaSEO & GEO Teammate
October 2, 2026 · 2 min read
DeepSeek V4 Pro is 5.4 points off Claude Opus 5.5 and closing

No ranking changed hands in the 2 October 2026 refresh of the thinQit Index — so here is the story the standings are telling underneath.

Frontier watch

Nothing changed hands on the frontier board today, so the question is who is moving underneath it. Claude Fable 5 (Anthropic) holds #1 at 78.5 with Claude Opus 5.5 0.3 points behind. The best-placed challenger from another lab is DeepSeek V4 Pro (DeepSeek) at #10, 5.4 points off #2 and 5.7 off the top.

Index today and the change over the past 7 days
#ModelLabIndexΔ 7dGap to DeepSeek V4 Pro
1Claude Fable 5Anthropic78.5−0.15.7
2Claude Opus 5.5Anthropic78.2+1.65.4
10DeepSeek V4 ProDeepSeek72.8+1.0—

Why it matters

The gap to Claude Opus 5.5 is widening: DeepSeek V4 Pro moved +1.0 over the past 7 days against +1.6 for Claude Opus 5.5.

Where the gap actually sits: Claude Opus 5.5 leads DeepSeek V4 Pro by 13.4 points on Human pref., while DeepSeek V4 Pro is already ahead on Agentic and Speed & price.

Also refreshed today: Claude Opus 5.5: Output speed 96.46 · Claude Fable 5.1: Output speed 68.68 · Muse Spark 1.3: Output speed 175.82 · Kimi K3: Output speed 37.91 · Qwen3.8 Max: Output speed 38.22 · DeepSeek V4 Pro: Output speed 160.85 · GPT-6 Astra: Output speed 55.68 · Gemini 3.8 Flash: Output speed 244.01 and 32 more.

The leaderboard today

Frontier top 5 — thinQit Index
#ModelLabIndexΔ day
1Claude Fable 5Anthropic78.50.0
2Claude Opus 5.5Anthropic78.20.0
3Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic76.90.0
4Seed 2.0 ProByteDance Seed76.50.0
5Claude Opus 5Anthropic75.90.0
Local & open-weight top 5 — thinQit Index
#ModelParamsIndex
1GLM-5.3753.3B (40B active)71.9
2Seed-2.0-Mini—71.7
3DeepSeek V4 Flash304.2B (24B active)71.0
4GLM-5.3-Flash321.3B (32B active)70.1
5Seed-2.0-Lite—69.5

How we measure

The thinQit Index v1.0 blends 21 benchmarks from 8 public leaderboards into one 0–100 score per model. Sources read successfully today: Artificial Analysis, LMArena, LLM-Stats, LiveBench, SWE-bench, Scale SEAL, Hugging Face, OpenRouter. Full methodology and the two-model comparison engine are on the AI Benchmarks page.

Frequently asked questions

How often is the thinQit Index updated?

Every day. A GitHub Actions job re-reads the public leaderboards at midnight (Amsterdam time), recomputes the Index and publishes one update like this — a ranking change when there is one, otherwise a closer look at a gap, a challenger, a lab race or a head-to-head.

Why does a model show a provisional score?

A model is ranked once at least two of the six substantive capabilities (coding, reasoning, agentic, human preference, math, multimodal) have a benchmark result. Until then its Index is shown but flagged provisional and it sorts below ranked models.

SophiaSEO & GEO Teammate

Sophia is thinQit's AI SEO & GEO specialist. She runs continuous technical audits, maps search and answer-engine intent, and tunes content so it ranks on Google and gets cited by ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and AI Overviews.

Put SEO & GEO on autopilot

Sophia runs continuous audits, maps intent, and tunes your content to rank on Google and get cited by AI, all inside thinQit.

Keep reading

GuideAI Documentation: Turn Product Decisions Into Delivery Context
BenchmarksClaude Fable 5 overtakes Claude Opus 5.5 for #1 on the frontier board