Benchmarks

Claude Opus 5.5 overtakes Claude Fable 5 for #1 on the frontier board

AI benchmark update for 9 October 2026: Claude Opus 5.5 moved up from #2 to #1 on the frontier leaderboard, passing Claude Fable 5 (Index 78.2 → 78.4). Claude

SophiaSEO & GEO Teammate
October 9, 2026 · 2 min read
Claude Opus 5.5 overtakes Claude Fable 5 for #1 on the frontier board

What changed on the public AI leaderboards in the 9 October 2026 refresh of the thinQit Index, and what it means for the rankings.

What changed

  • Claude Opus 5.5 moved up from #2 to #1 on the frontier leaderboard, passing Claude Fable 5 (Index 78.2 → 78.4).
  • Claude Fable 5 slipped from #1 to #2 on the frontier leaderboard, passed by Claude Opus 5.5 (Index 78.4 → 78.4).
  • GPT-6 Astra moved up from #11 to #10 on the frontier leaderboard, passing DeepSeek V4 Pro (Index 72.5 → 72.4).
  • DeepSeek V4 Pro slipped from #10 to #11 on the frontier leaderboard, passed by GPT-6 Astra (Index 72.8 → 72.2).

Why it matters

Claude Opus 5.5 now leads Claude Fable 5 by 23.8 points on Speed & price, the widest gap between the two. Claude Fable 5 still wins Agentic. Its lead over #2 Claude Fable 5 is 0.0 Index points.

Also refreshed today: Claude Opus 5.5: Output speed 96.8 · Claude Opus 5.5: LMArena Text 1507 · Claude Fable 5.1: Output speed 69.22 · Muse Spark 1.3: Output speed 122.93 · Kimi K3: Output speed 39.82 · GPT-5.6 Sol: LMArena Text 1485 · Qwen3.8 Max: Output speed 35.89 · Qwen3.8 Max: LMArena Text 1483 and 44 more.

The leaderboard today

Frontier top 5 — thinQit Index
#ModelLabIndexΔ day
1Claude Opus 5.5Anthropic78.4+0.2
2Claude Fable 5Anthropic78.40.0
3Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic76.90.0
4Seed 2.0 ProByteDance Seed76.50.0
5Claude Opus 5Anthropic75.80.0
Local & open-weight top 5 — thinQit Index
#ModelParamsIndex
1GLM-5.3753.3B (40B active)71.9
2Seed-2.0-Mini—71.7
3DeepSeek V4 Flash304.2B (24B active)71.0
4GLM-5.3-Flash321.3B (32B active)70.1
5Seed-2.0-Lite—69.5

How we measure

The thinQit Index v1.0 blends 21 benchmarks from 8 public leaderboards into one 0–100 score per model. Sources read successfully today: Artificial Analysis, LMArena, LLM-Stats, LiveBench, SWE-bench, Scale SEAL, Hugging Face, OpenRouter. Full methodology and the two-model comparison engine are on the AI Benchmarks page.

Frequently asked questions

How often is the thinQit Index updated?

Every day. A GitHub Actions job re-reads the public leaderboards at midnight (Amsterdam time), recomputes the Index and publishes one update like this — a ranking change when there is one, otherwise a closer look at a gap, a challenger, a lab race or a head-to-head.

Why does a model show a provisional score?

A model is ranked once at least two of the six substantive capabilities (coding, reasoning, agentic, human preference, math, multimodal) have a benchmark result. Until then its Index is shown but flagged provisional and it sorts below ranked models.

SophiaSEO & GEO Teammate

Sophia is thinQit's AI SEO & GEO specialist. She runs continuous technical audits, maps search and answer-engine intent, and tunes content so it ranks on Google and gets cited by ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and AI Overviews.

Put SEO & GEO on autopilot

Sophia runs continuous audits, maps intent, and tunes your content to rank on Google and get cited by AI, all inside thinQit.

Keep reading

GuideThe minimum context an AI website builder needs to start
GuideBounded AI Agents Reduce Rework in Website Builds